Macabresque

Great post! Tnx.

2010-11-10T07:09:26.100-08:00

Great post! Tnx.

http://twitter.com/macabresque'den takip edebi...

2010-09-14T02:18:31.269-07:00

http://twitter.com/macabresque'den takip edebilirsiniz.

Ben almanyadan sevgi, gercekten cok guzel bir blog...

2010-09-14T02:14:20.457-07:00

Ben almanyadan sevgi, gercekten cok guzel bir blog, eger twitter veya facebook sayfasi varsa hemen
ekliycegim.

[ ... ] link is being shared on Twitter right now....

2010-03-02T05:53:59.804-08:00

[ ... ] link is being shared on Twitter right now. @zenx, an influential author, said RT @1ndus: Xtreme [ ... ]

Thank you for your comment. I didn't think it ...

2009-11-03T15:52:51.885-08:00

Thank you for your comment. I didn't think it was entirely pretentious or wanky. I thought it was somewhere in between that and quiet and contemplative. I think with films like this, there's always the risk of being perceived as pretentious. Anyway, as I said I ended up liking the film. And the Q & A session made me like it more.

I clearly remember Christopher Baker saying that they were making two different films. I don't think that necessarily means that what they were doing was incohesive, I think it implies that the film was open to multiple interpretations. After all, they were making the film based on one script but their interpretations of that same script was different.

Oh, and how do I know it's not YOU who's stalking ME?!

I was also lucky enough to catch the screening of ...

2009-11-02T11:20:16.226-08:00

I was also lucky enough to catch the screening of this film at the Mu. And coincidentally I had also seen Moon that same day at the Verona (stop stalking me). I preferred this over Moon, (I didn’t find it pretentious or wanky) although the performance of Sam Rockwell in Moon was undeniably brilliant.
In your review, I believe you are misquoting the filmmakers in saying that “Christopher and the production designer Ray Rotton thought they were making a sci fi film whereas Martyn Park thought he was making a more psychological film”. This alludes that what they were doing was in-cohesive and random, which is clearly not the case. What I believe they said was, as there is only one man, and no one to bare witness to any of the events portrayed, the possibility of multiple interpretations allowed them to view what they were making from their own perspective without it affecting the ultimate direction of the film.
As Berkeley wrote "Esse est percipi" - "To be is to be perceived".

Simon.

Sagol hacicim :)

2009-07-23T06:57:02.329-07:00

Sagol hacicim :)

işte bunu sevdim hacıcım, çok ilginç görünüyor; gr...

2009-07-23T04:01:26.726-07:00

işte bunu sevdim hacıcım, çok ilginç görünüyor; great blog by da way :)

sevgiler

Murtius Basecimus

This interview is available in Turkish at http://w...

2009-07-18T17:45:46.381-07:00

This interview is available in Turkish at http://www.otekisinema.com

Ulan yeni gordum bu comment'i ha. Blog'a ilk comme...

2009-01-22T08:19:00.000-08:00

Ulan yeni gordum bu comment'i ha. Blog'a ilk comment gelmis, mutlu oldum! Operim maksimov'um, blog'u az daha guncellemeye hevesim var.

Can faninim abijim, soylememe gerek yok herhalde! ...

2008-12-25T00:08:00.000-08:00

Can faninim abijim, soylememe gerek yok herhalde! yazi da cillop olmus.

Ama sunu soylememe gerek var anlasilan: yok benim aklima geldiydi falan, yemem ben! macaberesque de benim aklima geldiydi halllallla!